Warriors At The Crease: Inside The Mind Of An Opener

The redoubtable commentator Henry Blofeld once observed one day cricket is an exhibition; a test match is an examination. If so its keenest students are the opening batsmen. The single minded, tactic driven obsessives who commence the innings. They face the new ball and a bowling attack designed to unsettle and probe for weakness. If the toss is lost there could also be the small matter of a turning wicket favouring the bowlers. An opener may have the full repertoire of shots in their locker; but will rarely have any need for them. They play every delivery on its merits and only look for boundaries when safe to do so. They push the score along with stone cold pragmatism and dourness. Neutralise the bowlers, protect the middle order and above all don’t lose your wicket. Many shoulder the added burden of captaincy, and England has a long line of practitioners in both disciplines.

Geoff Boycott was the text book opening batsmen who learnt his trade when it was still very much an art. A methodical and naturally cautious player he never took unnecessary chances; although would often be his own worst enemy. In June 1967, Boycott scored an unbeaten 246 in a six wicket victory over India. But he was dropped from the next test for disciplinary reasons.  It later emerged his omission was due to a deathly slow run rate especially on the first day, when the majority of spectators had left by tea. Ten hours at the crease with a strike rate of 44% was hardly edge of the seat stuff. But he did score 30 boundaries and shared three century partnerships; his innings had put England in a position where they couldn’t be beaten. Wasn’t he simply doing his job as an opening batsman? Boycott’s reputation had largely preceded him, and his fondness for shooting from the lip surely didn’t help his cause. For obdurate determination he had no equal; if anyone could carry his bat through an innings it was Boycs.

For all his qualities, Boycott could be selfish and thought nothing of running someone out to protect his own wicket. In 1974, he ruled himself out of the test side after reported differences with new captain Mike Denness. He returned for the 1977 Ashes and replaced Dennis Amiss in the 3rd Test at Trent Bridge. Local hero Derek Randall took the crease at 52-3.  Boycott ran for a risky single but didn’t call for it. Randall, a speedy runner between wickets was stranded at the wrong end. The crowd reacted with furious anger; he ran their boy out.  Boycott went onto to score 107 and became only the second player to bat on all five days of a test match. His smug radiance could be seen across five counties.

Boycott’s test career straddled three decades and 16 different opening partners. One of his more notable oppos was Mike Brearley; a master tactician who couldn’t cope with the responsibility of opening and captaining the side. He averaged only 22.88 and failed to hit a century but scored tons for fun at county level. It was Brearley’s skills as a captain that earned his place even if it meant sacrificing his own wicket. Brearley’s record of 17 wins and 4 defeats in 31 tests as captain is formidable. His blind spot is all the more baffling when he combined both roles so effectively at Middlesex. The functions of captain should sit perfectly with the opener who cogently leads from the front?

There were no such issues for Graham Gooch who enjoyed a 20 year test career and scored a staggering 8,900 runs. As the 1980s progressed he established himself as England’s premier opening batsman. He captained England for three years and clocked up 11 centuries in the process including a monstrous 333 against India in 1990. Gooch was the antidote to Boycott’s metronomic styling; he claimed to have only three shots in his locker, but had the confidence to entertain and keep the run rate ticking over. He formed a legendary partnership with Mike Atherton at the beginning of the 90s. They shared some heroic first wicket stands including three double centuries. Their partnership of 225 against India in 1990 is England’s 10th highest first wicket stand of all time.

When Gooch stepped down as England captain it was 25-year-old Mike Atherton who took the reins. His early outings as skipper weren’t successful; a loss to Australia was followed by a 3-1 series defeat against the West Indies. But soon found his feet with back-to-back centuries in the series victory over New Zealand in 1994. He survived the infamous ball tampering incident against South Africa and became one of only five players to captain England in 50 or more tests. His mental toughness was assured and dodged the missiles of public opinion with relative ease. Atherton was best with his back against the wall and played a true captain’s innings against South Africa in 1995. He doggedly resisted a ferocious Alan Donald to score an unbeaten 185 and salvage a draw.

Atherton’s most frequent opening partner was Alec Stewart, a natural middle order batsman and sometime wicket keeper. The Surrey right hander brought aggression and purpose to the role. He was the ultimate Johnny on the spot; keeping wicket, deputising as captain and opening the innings. Stewart averaged 46 as an opening batsman and made a record 133 test appearances; fifteen test centuries and a top score of 190 are remarkable figures for a player distracted by other disciplines. As Stewart’s test career drew to a close a new breed of opener began to emerge.

© David Morton

Marcus Trescothick made his test debut in 2000 against the West Indies. The media were quick to eulogise about the man from Somerset; a player with the temperament of Graham Gooch and stroke play of David Gower. In 2004, he formed a magnificent partnership with the newly capped Andrew Strauss. They shared an opening 1st wicket stand of 273 against South Africa; Tresco hailed his new partner, marvelling at how easy he made it look and that nothing fazed him; a description just as easily applied to Trescothick himself. With Michael Vaughan as captain the resurgence of English test cricket was in sight as the 2005 Ashes beckoned.

A memorable 2-1 series victory secured the Urn for the first time in almost 20 years. The opening pair shared over 800 runs with Tresco hitting an average of 43. However, there were storm clouds gathering when he returned from the 2006 tour of India due to a stress related condition. His England career continued to falter until it was announced in 2008 he would not return to international cricket. Trescothick’s autobiography later revealed he had suffered anxiety attacks since childhood; and playing domestic cricket meant he was only ever three hours away from his family. It was a refreshingly honest assessment of how depression affected his life; and an indication of the pressure routinely experienced by elite cricketers.

But it was Trescothick’s sad return from India that paved the way for Essex opener Alastair Cook to form the greatest England opening partnership of all time.  Cook complemented fellow left hander Andrew Strauss perfectly and became the Yin and Yang at 1 and 2. Cook revelled in the concentration of a long innings, while Strauss cut loose as the attacking element of the partnership. They opened together on 117 occasions and scored 4,711 runs at an average of 40.96; they threw in a dozen century stands just for good measure. When Strauss stood down as captain grasshopper Cook was his natural successor.

Cook was the archetypal opening batsman, and no real coincidence he was coached at Essex by Graham Gooch. Cook steered England to number 1 test status culminating in 2013 with another Ashes victory. However, dressing room tensions showed expectation generated more heat than light. He renounced the England captaincy in 2017 to gradually bring the curtain down on a glorious test career. His successor Joe Root tellingly drifted down the batting order after opening with Cook in 2013. Is the delicate balancing act of opening and captaincy generally too much even for the best of cricketers?   

As hungry young openers jostle for the top end this summer, it seems a poisoned chalice with more risk than reward. Many are called but ultimately few are chosen. Opening batsmen can be a combination of fire and ice but still have to stick with the brief. They are unlikely to be universally loved because of the responsibility they assume. Openers don’t have luxury of a middle order batsman who can rescue the innings; nor can they afford the crowd pleasing showmanship of an all-rounder. An opener is almost certainly saddled with the captaincy at some point in their career; simply because the job sits better with a top order player. It’s an assumption born on the battlefields of history that a captain leads from the front. God bless the opener and all the brave souls that take the job on.

Brian Penn


  • Cook and Strauss were only the greatest in terms of aggregate runs. England play a lot more matches now.

    Sutcliffe replaced probably the unluckiest opener in England’s history, the original ‘Jack’ Russell. He scored a century in each innings to win the deciding Test in a tour of SA. He was so ill in the second innings he had to bat down the order and the illness blighted his form during the next English season…. which was when England discovered Sutcliffe.

    BTW Boycott’s selfishness is probably better shown by his reported refusal to share information on opposition bowlers with teammates than by his running between wickets. I seem to recall hearing this about Australian ‘mystery’ spinner Johnny Gleeson in particular. I’m quite sympathetic to Boycott about Denness’s captaincy. In the WI 1973/74 Denness got the whizzy idea that he should open and Boycott bat at No.4 – and it didn’t work (Denness made a duck). Heroics from Boycott and Greig in the last Test salvaged that tour and kept Denness in the captaincy, an irony both players reportedly recognised.

    • I always rated Trescothick and Strauss as a better partnership. They complemented each other so well. They averaged significantly more than Strauss / Cook, who I always felt were a little too similar i.e. players that didn’t get a long way forward and preferred to play off the back foot. This made life easier for the bowlers, of course.

    • Simon
      Boycott has frequently said that there is no truth in those allegations, and that he never worked Gleason out but simply played him off the pitch.

  • The opening batsmen are required to do a certain job. So are the middle order. And then there are the all rounders before you come to the bowlers handy with the bat. A great team has strength in all departments. And then the difficult game of cricket ensures that no batsman can always deliver and when an opening batsmen gets out early another has to adapt and step into those early shoes. Recognising this instead of playing one batting position against another should be in the mind of the captain. The media like to ruffle feathers and will play the game of building up one player and knocking down another. The coach’s job is to set this aside. A team starts to fall apart if the coach has favourites and if the captain has favourites and if positions are handed to friends and former clubmates. England won’t be the only national team that has suffered from this but you can see in England cricket the influences of former players and captains at work and their club preferences. Essex had a powerful lobby and so did Surrey. If you get players from lesser Counties moving in order to catch the eye something is wrong. Nepotism and cronyism does not help cricket and neither does lauding only a few. What amazes me is how cricket commentators who are former players keep themselves in the public eye and keep parading their own successes. We see and hear about the same games over and over. As commentators they are now failing in their primary job. But they are very good at protecting their own reputations or even creating myths about themselves.

  • Even in white ball opening batsmen are still considered the norm. With the power plays and fielding restrictions they have to develop different skill sets as ‘going aerial’ is the most effective scoring method, but the openers natural predilection not to give his wicket away makes him more likely to build an innings. It’s why Buttler doesn’t really work as an opener, where’s Roy doesn’t work as well lower down. Morgan won’t even consider putting himself there and even Malan and Stokes are preferred in the middle order, yet they are all effective aerial hitters. Bairstow seems the exception here as he’s become more effective opening in white ball than batting down the order.
    Batsmen have their own preferences and in my experience don’t like being moved around in the order where their job becomes a different one.

  • A nicely balanced piece. We have been blessed with many openers, and a few opening pairs.

    Of all of them, I suppose Trescothick was the most watchable, though Boycott was easy on the eye, if not always on the brain. Few men have blocked more elegantly. I was lucky to be in Australia when Cook had his glory series, along with captain Strauss and Trott at 3. Who cares about aesthetics when you’re winning?

    I am old enough to have seen Hutton and Washbrook, though separately, never together for England. They would have made a fine sight, Hutton all poise and elegance, Washbrook the jaunty fighter. He saved a Roses match once, coming back in to bat against Trueman with a broken jaw.

    I suppose Hobbs and Sutcliffe would be the greatest pair, for England, if not of all time in all the world.

    • Good comment. Couldn’t help thinking, when reading the article, that cricket does go back back further than 1960. Len Hutton did indeed hold the world record highest innings score at one time.

      “ An opener may have the full repertoire of shots in their locker; but will rarely have any need for them” – unless you’re Colin Milburn, Sehwag, Greenidge, Barry Richards …….

      Still, it was a nice read

      • I would have loved to have gone back earlier than the 60s, but realistically you have to start the piece somewhere. Also, the Boycott era is when my memory kicks in. It’s difficult to be definitive and draw reasonable conclusions; and there are always exceptions to the rule as these comments have proved.


copywriter copywriting