Surely 90 Overs Per Day Isn’t Too Much To Ask?

It’s no secret that over rates in Test Matches are far below the 15 per hour target. Losing overs hurts spectators, especially when the price of tickets across the country is increasing and in some places, Lord’s, they are in excess of £160. A day at the cricket is a luxury and if you’re paying that amount, you don’t want to be short changed. Famously, Alex Hales refunded a fan 10% of his ticket after a day at Edgbaston finished after just 81 overs. The disgruntled fan tweeted “I want 10% of my money back. Wouldn’t go to football and find it ended after 80mins” and it’s very difficult to disagree with them.

Something has to be done to remove unnecessary halts of play and not just ask quicks to run back to their marks. By applying some basic adjustments to the laws, the umpires will have flexibility to keep the game moving to ensure that fans see their fair share of play. Timings need to be guidelines, not laws; reviews, drinks and restarts need to be streamlined; and captains need relevant in-game forfeits to incentivise them to push the over rate. A Test Match is not just five days but 450 overs and a day’s play shouldn’t end until every ball of those 90 overs has been bowled, no matter how far past 6pm it is. 

The current penalty for slow over rates isn’t effective for most Test sides and umpires are not strict enough to tell sides to get a move on. Gone are the days of Steve Bucknor forcing a result in Karachi after dark. World Test Championship points don’t matter as they are unlikely to qualify for the final so docking them is pointless. I can’t believe I’m going to say it but the MCC should look to learn from the Hundred: if you don’t make the cut off time, it’s another fielder in the ring for the final over, giving the batting side a distinct advantage. We need an equivalent for Test match cricket, perhaps penalty runs added on at the end of an innings by the match referee, or a delay of the 2nd new ball. If the fielding side are looking to avoid a forfeit, there will be more urgency between overs and less time wasting.

The attempts to get the ball changed is my biggest pet peeve slowing over rates and England are by far the worst for it. During the Indian second innings at Edgbaston, Broad and Stokes tried on three consecutive balls to get the umpires to change it, each time test the ball through the rings. Sky and BBC pundits have suggested penalty runs for unsuccessful attempts but I think we can treat it like reviews. You get one unsuccessful attempt to change the ball every 80 overs. If you are unsuccessful, that’s it, you’re using the ball you’ve got until the new one. Teams won’t look to change the ball unless it has actual damage like being out of shape or having scuffs or cuts.

The review system can be streamlined to lower the time it takes out the game. Hawkeye can’t be rushed as it takes time to generate the imagery but we can increase the efficiency of the interpretation with specialist third umpires. Or perhaps doing away with it when the spin vision replay shows that the ball is clearly hitting outside the line or pitching outside leg. We could continue to play and have the third umpire confirm this after Hawkeye has loaded so we don’t have to delay the game further?

Breaks for rain and light need to be more efficient. Obviously there are some conditions that cannot be played in but we can change how and when we go on and off due to adverse conditions. On the third day at Edgbaston, the covers were off at 13:15 but play didn’t restart until 13:30. That’s three or four overs lost for no reason. Anyone who’s played through rain delays in club cricket knows it takes longer than fifteen minutes to let the outfield dry and with modern drainage systems and ground teams, there’s no need to delay restarts. We also need to add flexibility to laws on playing during rain. The umpires are there to apply the laws with their discretion yet currently there is no room for negotiation: play cannot restart until rain has stopped. In actuality there are many occasions when play could easily continue through light rain. This hardline approach keeps players off and frustrates fans. Bad light is a similar issue. The notion that floodlights are there to supplement light, not replace it seems illogical and there just needs to be more resilience against it by bowling spinners. Just keep playing for as long as you can by any means.

This summer there have been more disturbances caused by people moving behind the bowler’s arm. We need to ensure people cannot move near side screens during the over. Stewards in these areas need to be stricter on the numbers they let through each over and on people standing up. We could place the most experienced stewards on the gates in these blocks to resolve this, or increase the size of the screens so there are no spectators in the batter’s eyeline. 

I hope some of these ideas have resonated with you; I’d love them to be discussed within the community and genuinely considered as options for improving the game. Test Cricket needs to sort out the issue of losing overs, especially if we want to retain fans and keep people buying tickets to live games.

Thomas Rose


  • My solution:
    Session 1 – 34 overs to be bowled. Play continues into the lunch break until they have been.
    Session 2 – 32 overs to be bowled. Play continues into the tea break until they have been.
    Session 3 – 34 overs to be bowled. Play continues until they have been.
    Result – 100 overs in the day. Captains would ensure that “overtime” wouldn’t be required by making greater use of bowlers with short run-ups and geeing up the fielders. No need for fines or penalty runs.
    Also apply Thomas’ sensible suggestions re drinks, restarts and reviews.

  • While I agree I don’t like the penalty concept of short form games, it bastardises the integrity of test cricket. Max’s concept of applying the overs to each session is a good step forward and so what if it goes beyond the TV broadcasting time?

    Perhaps the TV rights money could be withheld from the administrators in such cases which I am sure would soon have them speeding up breaks and limiting the legion unofficial drinks and glove breaks. The umpires really need to put their foot down on the absurd ball changes too.

    • Chris
      I very much agree with you about the penalty system being inappropriate for Test cricket. It would compromise the very essence of the game.

  • I’m not sure the ball change scenario is fair given the fact that each and every Dukes has been substandard across all 4 test matches played this summer. Something to do with the leather and Covid and other stuff! But I went to Lords on the first day and saw England bowl a remarkable 9 overs in the first hour. Ok wickets were falling but watching Root polish the ball whilst the bowler was back at his mark didn’t make any sense whatsoever and that theme continued throughout the day. But I’ll end this with the postulation that if the game gets a win as a result, within the 5 days, then there’s no need to penalise the teams – if it ends in a draw then let loose the arbiters and penalisers – and make it painful.

  • How about – spectators are refunded £10 for every over short. If the administrators (ECB) are hit in the pocket, something will soon be done about it

  • Totally agree. Just make lunch after 30 overs, tea after 60, with adjustents for weather breaks. And above all, stop ending play 8 overs short on sunny evenings just because it’s 6.30. It’s mental.

  • Today’s cricket is played in a pressured environment where every decision is repeatedly analysed and as such part of captaincy is to slow the game down to give yourself room to manoeuvre. Bazball is about batting, not bowling and fielding, where the game drags as before on in a committee structure. Very few bowlers are seen to be getting on with it as they stroll back to their marks. I remember in the 60’s and 70’s watching spinners bowl through entire sessions, bowling 45-50 overs in that time. They knew what fields they wanted and who they wanted to field where, this being worked out before they set foot on the field. In addition keepers and close fielders even ran between overs. White ball, with its extra tactical concentration epitomised by Dermot Reeve’s ‘every ball is an event’ must take a lot of the blame for this at test level.

  • The total silence from the mainstream media on the issue shows there isn’t the faintest intention of doing anything about it.

    Plenty of points made already I agree with, but two additional ones:
    1) The solutions mustn’t penalise the fielding side too much because the batting side can also slow the over rate down. The idea of not taking breaks until a set number of overs are bowled is good in that regard.
    2) The DRS replays should be limited in number. If it needs constant replays there is legitimate doubt.

  • I very much agree with the principle that Max sets out and have argued for this for years. It has many advantages, not least that the ‘extra’ overs would be played in similar conditions to those preceding them, rather than at the end of the day when they will invariably be different, and the side batting might have changed. I would also involve the umpires, by including overs bowled per session as a metric by which they are assessed. They could be relayed the actual against required figures by the fourth umpire and keep the fielding side captain informed of any défit it throughout the session.
    I simply don’t buy the counter arguments the most ludicrously fallacious of which is catering ! You only have to see the swathes of empty seats in the afternoon sessions of most Test matches to see how important precise timings are to those catering for corporate clients !

  • Laptop with i5 processor: You are here because you want to get the best performance and high-quality laptop
    with high-line specs like a core i5 processor. A laptop with an i5 processor is the most in-demand laptop included in
    the list of high-performance laptops.We can use the core i5 laptop for Photoshop, video editing, programming, the latest games, and watching HD Videos.

    Laptop with i5 processor

  • The penalty system isn’t fair enough and we completely agree with that.

    Also if you are cricket, you can consider betting on own website to earn money legally.


copywriter copywriting